ConSOLE 11 2003 Padova University

The syntax of ergativity: Collective versus individual feature checking

Mario van de Visser

Syntactic ErgativityFeature CheckingErgative Case Patterns

Abstract

Syntactically ergative languages like Dyirbal challenge generative syntactic theories. They treat the direct object as the highest argument in the clause, instead of the (transitive) subject. Previously formulated theories overestimate (Marantz 1984, Murasugi 1992) or deny (Bobaljik 1993) the phenomenon. I will show that a theory on feature checking, taken from Koster (1999, 2000), predicts two different types of syntactic ergativity when extended to ergative case patterns. Apart from Dyirbal, syntactically ergative constructions in languages like Balinese can now be accounted for. Finally, the proposal makes an interesting prediction on the status of morphologically ergative languages.

Access & Citation

Citation Formats

APA Style

Mario van de Visser (2003). the syntax of ergativity: collective versus individual feature checking. In Proceedings of ConSOLE 11, edited by Marjo van Koppen, Joanna Sio, Mark de Vos, (pp. 1-15).

BibTeX

@inproceedings{Visser-ConSOLE11-2002, title={The syntax of ergativity: Collective versus individual feature checking}, author={Mario van de Visser}, booktitle={Proceedings of ConSOLE 11}, year={2003}, pages={1-15}, editor={Marjo van Koppen and Joanna Sio and Mark de Vos} }