ConSOLE 32 2024 Queen Mary University of London

Different omission mechanisms in an A-not-A coordination - Backward deletion vs. forward ellipsis

Lulu Guo

Queen Mary University of London

lulu.guo@qmul.ac.uk
A-not-A questionsEllipsisMandarin syntax

Abstract

This paper explores the derivation mechanism of A-not-A questions, one of the four types of interrogatives in Mandarin Chinese. Most previous literature has adopted Huang’s (1991) modular approach to explain the various subtypes of A-not-A questions either through reduplication or Anaphoric Ellipsis. However, Huang’s approaches leave unexplained a set of theoretical issues, e.g., the nature of negation in A-not-A questions. Building on Huang (1991), I argue for a unified analysis of the different A-not-A variants, i.e., the syntax of A-not-A questions is an asyndetic coordination (no coordinators between conjuncts), and the different A-not-A variants are derived from either backward deletion or forward ellipsis.

Access & Citation

Citation Formats

APA Style

Lulu Guo (2024). different omission mechanisms in an a-not-a coordination - backward deletion vs. forward ellipsis. In Proceedings of ConSOLE 32, edited by Federica Longo, Leonardo Russo Cardona, Tommaso Sgrizzi, Atefeh Shahbazi, Hadis Tamleh, (pp. 41-59).

BibTeX

@inproceedings{guo-ellipsis-2024, title={Different omission mechanisms in an A-not-A coordination - Backward deletion vs. forward ellipsis}, author={Lulu Guo}, booktitle={Proceedings of ConSOLE 32}, year={2024}, pages={41-59}, editor={Federica Longo and Leonardo Russo Cardona and Tommaso Sgrizzi and Atefeh Shahbazi and Hadis Tamleh} }