ConSOLE 21 2013 University of Potsdam

Missing [HUMAN] objects: active and SE morphology investigated

Marta Ruda

Jagiellonian University in Krakow

marta.ruda@uj.edu.pl

Abstract

In this paper, two constructions which have been described in the literature as involving missing/null objects denoting indeterminate humans will be compared with respect to their morphosyntactic and interpretational properties. The discussion will focus on Polish and will show that the relevant similarities and differences between the two constructions can be derived on the assumption that the interpretation of the internal theta role is partially achieved by different means in the two contexts and that there are differences between the constructions as far as the composition of the extended verbal projection is considered.

Access & Citation

Citation Formats

APA Style

Marta Ruda (2013). missing [human] objects: active and se morphology investigated. In Proceedings of ConSOLE 21, edited by Martin Kohlberger, Kate Bellamy, Eleanor Dutton, (pp. 206-228).

BibTeX

@inproceedings{ruda-missing-human-objects-2013, title={Missing [HUMAN] objects: active and SE morphology investigated}, author={Marta Ruda}, booktitle={Proceedings of ConSOLE 21}, year={2013}, pages={206-228}, editor={Martin Kohlberger and Kate Bellamy and Eleanor Dutton} }

Related Works

The nature of cognate objects. A syntactic approach

ConSOLE 16 • Cristina Real Puigdollers

2008

A unified analysis of two classes of Slavic verb-prefixes

ConSOLE 14 • Boban Arsenijević

2007

Aspect and verbalising morphology in Polish nominalisations

ConSOLE 28 • Arkadiusz Kwapiszewski

2020